A 3-step Mechanical Digestion Method to Harvest Adipose-derived Stromal Vascular Fraction.
Tiryaki T., Condé-Green A., Cohen SR., Canikyan S., Kocak P.
Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 35 on Face & Skin, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2020)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- 35
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 32309095
- PMCID
- PMC7159941
- DOI
- 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002652
- Citations
- 27
Abstract (original English)
Background Adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) isolation with enzymatic digestion is the gold standard, but is expensive, having practical and legal concerns. The alternative mechanical SVF isolation methods provide lower cell yields as they employ either centrifugation, emulsification, or digestion steps alone. We combined mechanical processing with buffer incubation and centrifugation steps into an isolation method called "mechanical digestion" and compared the cell yields with that of enzymatic digestion. Methods A total of 40-mL lipoaspirate was harvested from 35 women undergoing liposuction and was submitted to conventional enzymatic digestion for SVF isolation or mechanical digestion using a closed unit harnessing 3 ports with blades, followed by buffer incubation and centrifugation. Culture of the SVFs and flow cytometry were performed. Results The SVF cell yield obtained by enzymatic digestion was significantly higher 3.38 × 10 6 /mL (±3.63; n = 35) than that obtained by mechanical digestion 1.34 × 10 6 /mL (±1.69; n = 35), P = 0.015. The average cell viability was 82.86% ± 10.68 after enzymatic digestion versus 85.86% ± 5.74 after mechanical digestion, which was not significant. Mechanical digested SVF expressed 2-fold higher stem cell surface markers compared with enzymatically digested SVF. Mechanical digestion was less time consuming, cost effective, and did not
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Oncologic safety of autologous fat grafting in head and neck cancer patients: A scoping review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 116 on Face & Skin, published in Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 116
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stromal Vascular Fraction-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Meta-analysis on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Aesthetic Plast Surg - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Applications of Exosomes in Female Medicine: A Systematic Review of Molecular Biology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The use of cellular therapies for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of behavioral and molecular outcomes.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 8 on Neuroinflammation, published in Neurosurg Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 8
Neurosurg Rev - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteogenic and Biocompatibility Potential of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Cells Studies
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, published in J Funct Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Funct Biomater