Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

3D Bioprinting of Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Huang J., Xiong J., Wang D., Zhang J., Yang L., Sun S.

Narrative Review, published in Gels (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Gels (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34563030
PMCID
PMC8482067
DOI
10.3390/gels7030144
Citations
58

Abstract (original English)

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an emerging technology based on 3D digital imaging technology and multi-level continuous printing. The precise positioning of biological materials, seed cells, and biological factors, known as "additive biomanufacturing", can provide personalized therapy strategies in regenerative medicine. Over the last two decades, 3D bioprinting hydrogels have significantly advanced the field of cartilage and bone tissue engineering. This article reviews the development of 3D bioprinting and its application in cartilage tissue engineering, followed by a discussion of the current challenges and prospects for 3D bioprinting. This review presents foundational information on the future optimization of the design and manufacturing process of 3D additive biomanufacturing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.