3D-bioprinting for joint regeneration
Li W., Wang Y., Cui Y., Wu Q., Ying P., Dai K.
Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, Ligament Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42027392
- PMCID
- PMC13099821
- DOI
- 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1742269
Abstract (original English)
Joint injuries represent a significant clinical challenge with limited regenerative options. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a transformative technology, enabling the precise fabrication of patient-specific, anatomically matched, multilayered scaffolds that replicate the complex structure and gradient of natural joint tissues. This review comprehensively summarizes advances in bioprinting techniques, cell sources, and biomaterial formulations, emphasizing cell-laden bioinks composed of biomaterials and viable cells to create functional, bioactive constructs. Beyond basic fabrication, we evaluate the functional performance of bioprinted cartilage, bone, and ligaments, and we discuss strategies for engineering osteochondral interfaces and ligament-bone interfaces to support biomimetic mechanical properties and tissue integration. We further compare major printing modalities, including extrusion-based printing, inkjet, and laser-assisted bioprinting, and we discuss how modality-specific trade-offs in resolution, viscosity window, and cell stress influence construct fidelity and repair outcomes. In addition, we examine biofunctionalization strategies that incorporate growth factors, stem cells, and exosomes to enhance regenerative signaling and matrix remodeling. Notably, 3D bioprinting for joint regeneration is transitioning from bench to bedside, and we detail t
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci