Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

3D-printed artificial bone scaffolds: the design of materials, the incorporation of bioactive substances, and the integration of vascularized tissue flaps

Duan Q., Shao H., Luo N., Wang F., Cheng L., Ying J.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40979638
PMCID
PMC12443788
DOI
10.3389/fbioe.2025.1614727
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

With the advancements in tissue engineering, materials science, microsurgery, and the maturation of 3D printing technology, 3D-printed artificial bone scaffolds have provided an innovative strategy that integrates structural bionics and functional synergy for the treatment of large-segment bone defects. Compared with conventional bone grafting, this technology not only precisely reconstructs anatomical geometry and promotes cell migration through porous design, but also, via surface modification, enables accurate loading and controlled release of multiple bioactive factors, thereby actively regulating osteogenesis and angiogenesis, enhancing regeneration efficiency, and overcoming the traditional scaffold limitation of "mechanical support only, lack of biological guidance." Nevertheless, repair of large-segment defects still faces challenges such as early ischemia, restricted nutrient diffusion, and slow callus formation. To address this bottleneck, the present study summarizes a "vascularization-osteogenesis integration" scaffold design paradigm that combines 3D printing with vascularized bone substitutes, realizing a "scaffold plus vascular-pedicled flap" co-implantation strategy; the vascular network of the flap traverses the entire scaffold, establishing a co-culture microenvironment of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells and maximizing osteogenic and angiogenic ef

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research