3D Printing for Bone-Cartilage Interface Regeneration
Xu J., Ji J., Jiao J., Zheng L., Hong Q., Tang H.
Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2022)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 35237582
- PMCID
- PMC8882993
- DOI
- 10.3389/fbioe.2022.828921
- Citations
- 20
Abstract (original English)
Due to the vasculature defects and/or the avascular nature of cartilage, as well as the complex gradients for bone-cartilage interface regeneration and the layered zonal architecture, self-repair of cartilage and subchondral bone is challenging. Currently, the primary osteochondral defect treatment strategies, including artificial joint replacement and autologous and allogeneic bone graft, are limited by their ability to simply repair, rather than induce regeneration of tissues. Meanwhile, over the past two decades, three-dimension (3D) printing technology has achieved admirable advancements in bone and cartilage reconstruction, providing a new strategy for restoring joint function. The advantages of 3D printing hybrid materials include rapid and accurate molding, as well as personalized therapy. However, certain challenges also exist. For instance, 3D printing technology for osteochondral reconstruction must simulate the histological structure of cartilage and subchondral bone, thus, it is necessary to determine the optimal bioink concentrations to maintain mechanical strength and cell viability, while also identifying biomaterials with dual bioactivities capable of simultaneously regenerating cartilage. The study showed that the regeneration of bone-cartilage interface is crucial for the repair of osteochondral defect. In this review, we focus on the significant progress and
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci