80 years of extracellular vesicles: from discovery to clinical translation
Li Q., Ding Y., Shi Y., Qiu C., Lei L., Li S.
Narrative Review, published in Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41695594
- PMCID
- PMC12902917
- DOI
- 10.20517/evcna.2025.161
- Citations
- 14
Abstract (original English)
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are heterogeneous, lipid bilayer-enclosed vesicles secreted by cells. Research on EVs dates back to the 1940s, and the term "exosomes" - a major subtype of EVs - was coined in 1981 to describe small membrane vesicles shed from cells. However, it is only in the past two decades that research in this area has expanded rapidly. By transferring functional biomolecules, EVs play a pivotal role in intercellular communication and regulate a wide range of cellular functions under both physiological and pathological conditions. Owing to their high biocompatibility, capacity to protect encapsulated cargo from degradation, and ability to cross biological barriers, EVs also show great promise as biomarkers and drug-delivery systems. Following the first, albeit unintentional, isolation of EVs in 1946, the 80th anniversary of EV research is now approaching. In this review, we trace the history of EV research and summarize key advances in the field. We also discuss current challenges and future prospects in this rapidly evolving area.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.