Adipogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells on 3D silk scaffolds.
Choi JH., Bellas E., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan DL.
Laboratory Study, published in Methods Mol Biol (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Methods Mol Biol (2011)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 21082412
- PMCID
- PMC4123545
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-61737-960-4_23
- Citations
- 30
Abstract (original English)
Current treatment modalities for soft tissue defects due to various pathologies and trauma include autologous grafting and the use of commercially available fillers. However, these treatment methods are associated with a number of limitations, such as donor site morbidity and volume loss over time. As such, improved therapeutic options are needed. Tissue engineering techniques offer novel solutions to these problems through development of bioactive tissue constructs that can regenerate adipose tissue with an appropriate structure and function. The recent advances in the derivation and characterization of hASCs have led to numerous studies of soft tissue reconstruction. In this chapter, we discuss methods in which our laboratory has used hASCs and silk scaffolds for adipose tissue engineering. The use of naturally occurring and clinically acceptable materials such as silk protein for tissue-engineering applications poses advantages with respect to biocompatibility and mechanical and biological properties.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.