Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMed

Adipose-derived stem cells in orthopaedic pathologies.

Usuelli FG., D'Ambrosi R., Maccario C., Indino C., Manzi L., Maffulli N.

Randomized Controlled Trial, published in Br Med Bull (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Br Med Bull (2017)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29253149
DOI
10.1093/bmb/ldx030
Citations
34

Abstract (original English)

Introduction To examine the current literature regarding the clinical application of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) for the management of orthopaedic pathologies. Sources of data MEDLINE,SCOPUS, CINAHL and EMBASE (1950 to April 14, 2017) were searched by two independent investigators for articles published in English. Reviews, meta-analyses, expert opinions, case reports, mini case series and editorials were excluded. Furthermore, we excluded animal studies, cadaveric studies and in vitro studies. Areas of agreement ADSCs seem to produce excellent clinical results. However, the length and modalities of follow-up in the different conditions are extremely variable. Nevertheless, it appears that the use of adipose-derived stem cells is associated with subjective and objective clinical improvements and minimal complication rates. Areas of controversy None of the studies identified is a randomized double-blinded trial, and most of the selected studies present major limitations, and different methods, confounding the results of our review. Growing points It is necessary to conduct more and better studies to ascertain whether ADSCs really play a role in orthopaedic surgery with particular attention to ADSCs harvesting method, type of administration and the conditions treated. Areas timely for developing research The current literature regarding the use of ADSCs for orthopaedic pat

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueArthroscopyCells, CulturedGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMusculoskeletal DiseasesOrthopedicsRegenerative MedicineStem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.