Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells isolated from old animals exhibit reduced capacity to support the formation of microvascular networks.

Aird AL., Nevitt CD., Christian K., Williams SK., Hoying JB., LeBlanc AJ.

Animal Study, published in Exp Gerontol (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Exp Gerontol (2015)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25617825
PMCID
PMC4346434
DOI
10.1016/j.exger.2015.01.044
Citations
36

Abstract (original English)

Unlabelled Adipose-derived regenerative and stem cells, defined collectively as the stromal vascular fraction (SVF), support the formation of neovascular networks at the site of implantation. The effect of advancing age on SVF cell population effectiveness towards stimulated neovascularization was evaluated. Methods SVF was enzymatically isolated from adipose of young (ySVF, 4 months) or old (oSVF, 24 months) Fisher-344 rats, combined with type I collagen and polymerized. Encapsulated SVF was implanted subcutaneously into young Rag1 mice for two or four weeks. Angiogenic function of age-dependent SVF was also extensively evaluated in vitro using standard assays. Results In vitro studies indicated no difference in angiogenic function between ySVF and oSVF (viability, proliferation, migration, and tube-formation). At two weeks post-implantation, there was no age-related difference in percent apoptosis in explanted constructs. By four weeks post-implantation, oSVF implants displayed 36% less total vessels/mm(2), 43% less perfused vessels/mm(2), and exhibited greater percent apoptosis compared to ySVF (n ≥ 12). Blocking thrombospondin-1 (Thbs-1), a protein found to be highly expressed in oSVF but not ySVF, increased the percent of perfused vascular volume and vessel diameters in oSVF constructs after two weeks compared to oSVF implants treated with control antibody. Conclusions Adv

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAgingAnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationFemaleIschemiaMaleMice

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.