Adipose mesenchymal stem cells and gingival mesenchymal stem cells have a comparable effect in endothelium repair.
Yang K., Xie D., Lin W., Xiang P., Peng C.
Laboratory Study, published in Exp Ther Med (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Exp Ther Med (2021)
- Country
- Greece
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 34676008
- PMCID
- PMC8524764
- DOI
- 10.3892/etm.2021.10851
- Citations
- 3
Abstract (original English)
Restenosis is the major factor influencing the long-term success rate of angioplasty and stent implantation and effective strategies to prevent restenosis remain limited. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are pluripotent stem cells capable of self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation, which may be able to promote endothelium repair, thereby reducing restenosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of adipose MSCs (AMSCs) and gingival MSCs (GMSCs) on endothelium repair. MSCs were isolated from two human tissue types, namely adipose tissue and gingival tissue, and the effects of AMSCs and GMSCs in ex vivo endothelium repair and on vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth were examined. To compare the feasibility of using AMSCs and GMSCs for the repair of endothelium damage in endothelial cell (EC) damage and vasoproliferative disorders, an ex vivo model of endothelium repair in a co-culture system was developed. It was indicated that AMSCs and GMSCs expressed characteristic MSC markers (CD105 and CD166). 3H-thymidine incorporation in the co-culture group of AMSCs and SMCs in the presence of ECs was lower compared with that in the GMSC and SMC co-culture group. The protein expression level of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the co-culture group of AMSCs and SMCs in the presence of ECs were lower compared with that in the GMSC and SMC co-culture group. After co
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.