Adipose tissue-derived regenerative cells improve implantation of fertilized eggs in thin endometrium.
Yotsumoto F., Iwaguro H., Harada Y., Sobajima S., Suwabe T., Miyamoto S.
Animal Study, published in Regen Med (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Regen Med (2020)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 32698666
- DOI
- 10.2217/rme-2020-0037
- Citations
- 14
Abstract (original English)
Aim: Embryo implantation and subsequent pregnancy depends on endometrial thickness. To investigate potential fertility strategies for women with thin endometrium, we explored the efficacy of adipose tissue-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) on thin endometrium and embryo implantation in a mouse model. Materials & methods: ADRCs isolated from mouse subcutaneous fat were characterized by flow cytometry. Endometrium thickness, endometrial fibrosis, embryo implantation and angiogenesis factors were evaluated in uterine cavities of ethanol-induced thin endometrium mice with ADRC transplantation. Results: ADRCs included adipose-derived stem cells and some blood vessel component cells. ADRCs improved endometrial thickness, endometrial fibrosis and embryo implantation and augmented vascular endothelial growth factor expression in the mouse uterine. Conclusion: ADRCs may be a useful therapeutic strategy to improve fertility of women with thin endometrium.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.