Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction.
Gokce A., Peak TC., Abdel-Mageed AB., Hellstrom WJ.
Narrative Review, published in Curr Urol Rep (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Curr Urol Rep (2016)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 26757908
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11934-015-0569-8
- Citations
- 18
Abstract (original English)
Although a spectrum of options is available for erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment, ED in diabetics, post-prostatectomy patients, and those with Peyronie's disease (PD) may be more severe in degree and less likely to respond to conventional medical therapies. Unfortunately, there have been limited breakthroughs in therapeutic options for severe ED during the past decade. However, one of the more fascinating strategies in preclinical development to treat ED is stem cell transplantation. Depending on the cell type, recent research has demonstrated that with transplantation, these stem cells can exert a paracrine effect on surrounding penile tissues and differentiate into smooth muscle, endothelium, and neurons. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have become a valuable resource because of their abundance and ease of isolation. It is evident that ADSCs may provide a realistic, therapeutic modality for the treatment of ED. In this review, we will cover the literature that has evaluated ADSCs in the treatment of ED.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.