Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMed

Adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction for treating hands of patients with systemic sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial Autologous AD-SVF versus placebo in systemic sclerosis.

Daumas A., Magalon J., Jouve E., Casanova D., Philandrianos C., Abellan Lopez M.

Randomized Controlled Trial on Systemic / IV, published in Rheumatology (Oxford) (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford) (2022)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34297066
DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/keab584
NCT
NCT02558543
Citations
28

Abstract (original English)

Objective To assess the superiority of adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction (AD-SVF) injection into the fingers vs placebo in reducing hand disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. Methods We performed a double-blind, multicentre, phase II trial from October 2015 to January 2018 in France. SSc patients with a Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS) ≥20/90 were randomized 1:1 to receive injection of AD-SVF or placebo. AD-SVF was obtained using the automated processing Celution 800/CRS system. The placebo was lactated Ringer's solution. The primary efficacy end point was the change of the CHFS score from baseline to 3 months. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the CHFS score at 6 months, hand function, vasculopathy, hand pain, skin fibrosis, sensitivity of the finger pulps, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, patients and physician satisfaction, and safety. Results Forty patients were randomized. The AD-SVF and placebo groups were comparable for age, sex ratio, disease duration, skin fibrosis of the hands and main cause of hand disability. After 3 months' follow-up, hand function significantly improved in both groups with no between-group difference of CHFS (mean change of -9.2 [12.2] in the AD-SVF group vs -7.6 [13.2] in the placebo group). At 6 months, hand function improved in both groups. Conclusion This study showed an improvement of hand function i

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueFibrosisHandHumansScleroderma, SystemicStromal Vascular Fraction

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research