Adjuvant injection therapies following knee cartilage repair demonstrate heterogeneous evidence: A systematic review

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Purpose The objective of this study was to systematically review the existing literature related to adjuvant injection therapies among patients with cartilage defects of the knee joint who have undergone bone marrow stimulation procedures and ascertain their potential clinical benefits. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify articles documenting the utilization of adjuvant injection therapies after surgery for cartilage defects, with a minimum short-term follow-up. Animal studies, uncontrolled trials, studies lacking primary surgical intervention or those including patients with osteoarthritis were excluded. Results Twelve articles focusing on knee cartilage defects were analysed (531 patients). Platelet-rich plasma was used in eight studies, mesenchymal stromal cells in four and hyaluronic acid in one. Injection frequency and timing varied, with the most common timing being during surgery. Primary outcome measures included subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. Subjective IKDC showed significant difference in five out of nine studies and VAS in three out of eight studies, favouring injection therapy groups. Conclusion The present review demonstrates a large heterogeneity among

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.