Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advanced bioactive materials and strategies for tendon repair and function restoration

Wang S., Ou Z., Xiao F., Feng X., Tan L., Cheng S.

Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Scar, published in J Orthop Translat (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
J Orthop Translat (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41018026
PMCID
PMC12466151
DOI
10.1016/j.jot.2025.08.012
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Tendon injury is one of the most common clinical challenges in musculoskeletal disorders. Effective tendon repair is crucial for restoring patients' motor function and improving their quality of life. Recent advances in bioactive material-mediated tendon regeneration have shown great therapeutic potential and clinical relevance. However, systematic reviews that comprehensively integrate these developments are still scarce. Firstly, this article presents the selection of bioactive components, mainly including cell-based therapeutic strategies and nanodrug delivery strategies. Secondly, bioactive materials delivery system using tissue-engineered scaffolds is discussed in detail. In this section, we discuss the efficacy of scaffolds in tendon repair through different scaffold preparation methods and synthetic raw materials. Furthermore, the application of hydrogel systems such as enhanced hydrogels, bioadhesive hydrogels and multifunctional hydrogels in tendon repair strategies is systematically and comprehensively presented. Finally, based on a detailed review of the field, current challenges in the field were proposed and potential research directions in the field were identified, including potential research directions in smart bioactive materials and personalized treatment strategies. The translational potential of this article This review synthesizes tendon regeneration strat

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research