Advanced Hybrid Strategies of GelMA Composite Hydrogels in Bone Defect Repair
Yu H., Luo X., Li Y., Shao L., Yang F., Pang Q.
Narrative Review, published in Polymers (Basel) (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Polymers (Basel) (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39518248
- PMCID
- PMC11548276
- DOI
- 10.3390/polym16213039
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
To date, severe bone defects remain a significant challenge to the quality of life. All clinically used bone grafts have their limitations. Bone tissue engineering offers the promise of novel bone graft substitutes. Various biomaterial scaffolds are fabricated by mimicking the natural bone structure, mechanical properties, and biological properties. Among them, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), as a modified natural biomaterial, possesses a controllable chemical network, high cellular stability and viability, good biocompatibility and degradability, and holds the prospect of a wide range of applications. However, because they are hindered by their mechanical properties, degradation rate, and lack of osteogenic activity, GelMA hydrogels need to be combined with other materials to improve the properties of the composites and endow them with the ability for osteogenesis, vascularization, and neurogenesis. In this paper, we systematically review and summarize the research progress of GelMA composite hydrogel scaffolds in the field of bone defect repair, and discuss ways to improve the properties, which will provide ideas for the design and application of bionic bone substitutes.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.