Advanced technologies in periodontal tissue regeneration based on stem cells: Current status and future perspectives
Zeng WY., Ning Y., Huang X.
Narrative Review, published in J Dent Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Dent Sci (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33384839
- PMCID
- PMC7770316
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.008
- Citations
- 16
Abstract (original English)
Periodontitis is a progressive inflammation disease, the clinical management of which remains a challenge. The traditional management may control periodontal inflammation, but failed to regenerate functional periodontium. This review summarizes the most advancing regenerative techniques regarding stem cell culture and scaffold fabrication, such as cell sheeting, spheroid culture, electrospinning and 3D printing. The applications of different techniques manifest tremendous potential of regenerating the complete and functional periodontium. Albeit promising, new technologies have met with their own drawbacks such as insufficient vascularization and precision, which necessitate deeper modification. Thus, this review also points out the potential perspectives and methods aiming at their disadvantages, illuminating the directions of future researches to successful clinical scenarios.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.