Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advanced technologies in periodontal tissue regeneration based on stem cells: Current status and future perspectives

Zeng WY., Ning Y., Huang X.

Narrative Review, published in J Dent Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Dent Sci (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33384839
PMCID
PMC7770316
DOI
10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.008
Citations
16

Abstract (original English)

Periodontitis is a progressive inflammation disease, the clinical management of which remains a challenge. The traditional management may control periodontal inflammation, but failed to regenerate functional periodontium. This review summarizes the most advancing regenerative techniques regarding stem cell culture and scaffold fabrication, such as cell sheeting, spheroid culture, electrospinning and 3D printing. The applications of different techniques manifest tremendous potential of regenerating the complete and functional periodontium. Albeit promising, new technologies have met with their own drawbacks such as insufficient vascularization and precision, which necessitate deeper modification. Thus, this review also points out the potential perspectives and methods aiming at their disadvantages, illuminating the directions of future researches to successful clinical scenarios.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.