Advancements and challenges in stem/progenitor cell transplantation for dentin-pulp regeneration: a systematic review of animal studies (part I)

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Dentin-pulp regeneration through stem/progenitor cell transplantation represents a promising frontier in regenerative endodontics. This systematic review meticulously evaluates animal studies to investigate the efficacy of stem cell therapy in repairing/regenerating the dentine-pulp complex in mature/immature animal teeth. Employing a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed and Scopus databases up to October 2023, relevant English studies were identified/assessed. Evaluation parameters encompassed radiographic and histological assessments of dentin-pulp complex formation. Outcome measures included pulp-like and dentin-like tissues regeneration, apical healing, dentin thickening, apical closure, and dentinal bridge formation. The risk-of-bias assessment adhered to the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) guidelines. Out of 3250 identified articles, 23 animal experiments were included, categorized into regenerative procedures in mature teeth (n=11), regenerative procedures in immature teeth (n=4), and vital pulp therapy (n=8). Despite the promising potential, the bias in the included studies was high. Notably, Various scaffolds, and growth factors were employed, highlighting the heterogeneity across the studies. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) and bone marrow stem cells, especially specific subfractions, demonstrated notable regenerative potent

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.