Advancements in lung regeneration: from bench to bedside
Khayatan D., Barzegar PEF., Fatima A., Sattar T., Zahid A., Batool SA.
Narrative Review, published in J Transl Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Transl Med (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39905476
- PMCID
- PMC11796163
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12967-024-05954-6
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Lung disorders rank among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, presenting a critical challenge in healthcare. The underlying limited regenerative capacity of the lung makes this an unmet clinical need, often necessitating lung transplantation for patients with severe lung disease. However, the lack of viable donor organs underscores the urgent need for alternative therapeutic strategies. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive understanding of the structure of lung tissue and the complexities inherent in its regeneration. In this review, we explore recent breakthroughs in lung regenerative medicine, highlighting innovative approaches aimed at tackling lung and tracheal diseases. From stem cell and cell-based therapies to the utilization of biological and synthetic materials, as well as the strategic deployment of growth factors, a diverse array of strategies is being explored to rejuvenate lung function. By critical analysis of in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the emerging technology of lung regeneration research, shedding light on promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.