Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advancements in rhinoplasty: Exploring smart artificial cartilage implants for enhanced tissue regeneration and minimized rejection

Awde MH., Nasrallah J., Soloh N., Kanso H., Kanso N., Jawad A.

Narrative Review, published in Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41675872
PMCID
PMC12889356
DOI
10.1097/ms9.0000000000004461

Abstract (original English)

Rhinoplasty often requires cartilage grafts to restore nasal contour and function. Traditional options, such as autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic materials, remain limited by donor-site morbidity, restricted availability, and long-term complications, including resorption and extrusion. Advances in tissue engineering and biomaterial science have led to the development of smart artificial cartilage implants that combine mechanical strength with biologic responsiveness. These materials can adapt to external stimuli, such as mechanical load, temperature, or electrical signals, promoting better integration and durability. Hydrogels, piezoelectric composites, and nanohybrid scaffolds have shown enhanced chondrogenic potential and mechanical compatibility in preclinical studies. Furthermore, three-dimensional bioprinting and stem-cell-based strategies enable the fabrication of patient-specific constructs that reduce intraoperative manipulation and improve anatomical fit. Although early experimental and limited clinical results are promising, current evidence remains heterogeneous and largely confined to small case series. Broader clinical validation, standardized testing protocols, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to ensure safe and reproducible translation. Smart artificial cartilage implants thus represent a significant step toward next-generation rhinoplasty materials

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.