Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Advances in 3D-Printed Drug Delivery and Screening Platforms for Bone Disease Therapy

Timofticiuc IA., Grigore AG., Tomescu ET., Vlaicu TM., Dragosloveanu S., Scheau AE.

Clinical Trial on Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, published in Pharmaceutics (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Pharmaceutics (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41304711
PMCID
PMC12655624
DOI
10.3390/pharmaceutics17111372

Abstract (original English)

Bone diseases such as osteomyelitis, osteosarcoma, and osteoarthritis, as well as conditions caused by metabolic imbalances, including osteoporosis, require more efficient and optimized therapies. Systemic drug administration entails major disadvantages like cytotoxicity and adverse reactions, which can lead to serious complications or death. Therefore, local drug administration alternatives are currently under investigation for different pharmacological therapies. New vectors were created to improve control over administration, and 3D-printed and patient-specific drug delivery systems have been tested, revealing great potential. Moreover, 3D-printed platforms that mimic human tissues for drug testing are innovative solutions emerging for the pharmaceutical industry. Situated between in vitro and in vivo testing on human patients, they offer the advantage of reproducing functional architecture, providing results that are closer to those encountered in clinical trials performed on patients. In our article, we present the two categories of 3D systems, from the perspective of main drug groups (antibiotics, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory) as well as other categories, alongside their advantages, limitations, and their adaptations to 3D printing technologies. This article also highlights the technological drawbacks encountered in both delivery and screening systems, as well as the

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research