Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects

Sun J., Chen C., Zhang B., Yao C., Zhang Y.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Biomed Eng Online (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomed Eng Online (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40301861
PMCID
PMC12042599
DOI
10.1186/s12938-025-01381-w
Citations
32

Abstract (original English)

The treatment of large bone defects remains a significant clinical challenge due to the limitations of current grafting techniques, including donor site morbidity, restricted availability, and suboptimal integration. Recent advances in 3D bioprinting technology have enabled the fabrication of structurally and functionally optimized scaffolds that closely mimic native bone tissue architecture. This review comprehensively examines the latest developments in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration, focusing on three critical aspects: (1) material selection and composite design encompassing metallic; (2) structural optimization with hierarchical porosity (macro/micro/nano-scale) and biomechanical properties tailored; (3) biological functionalization through growth factor delivery, cell seeding strategies and surface modifications. We critically analyze scaffold performance metrics from different research applications, while discussing current translational barriers, including vascular network establishment, mechanical stability under load-bearing conditions, and manufacturing scalability. The review concludes with a forward-looking perspective on innovative approaches such as 4D dynamic scaffolds, smart biomaterials with stimuli-responsive properties, and the integration of artificial intelligence for patient-specific design optimization. These technological advancements collect

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Bone and BonesAnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringBone RegenerationTissue ScaffoldsMechanical PhenomenaBiomechanical PhenomenaPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research