Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advances in biomaterial-based composite spheroid for articular cartilage regeneration

Udomluck N., Park H., Lee JY.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in J Tissue Eng (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Tissue Eng (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40626181
PMCID
PMC12231992
DOI
10.1177/20417314251349669

Abstract (original English)

Articular cartilage plays a crucial role in reducing friction between bones and enabling movements; however, it is frequently degraded due to persistent joint stress, aging, and osteoarthritis. As its self-repair ability is limited, various cell-based therapeutic strategies have been developed for cartilage regeneration. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures inadequately replicate the complex intercellular interactions of native cartilage. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) cell spheroid cultures can more accurately mimic in vivo cellular physiology, offering superior regenerative potential via improved cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. These interactions can be enhanced with biomaterials to form composite spheroids, which exhibit substantial potential for improving cartilage regeneration and attenuating osteoarthritis progression in vivo by promoting cell survival and tissue integration. This review highlights current strategies for developing biomimetic composite spheroid systems, including spheroid encapsulation, scaffold incorporation, and 3D bioprinting. Furthermore, we discuss their advantages, translational potential for in vivo cartilage repair, and the challenges and future directions in cartilage tissue engineering.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research