Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advances in biomaterial-based tissue engineering for peripheral nerve injury repair

Yao X., Xue T., Chen B., Zhou X., Ji Y., Gao Z.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioact Mater (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39760068
PMCID
PMC11699443
DOI
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.005
Citations
43

Abstract (original English)

Peripheral nerve injury is a common clinical disease. Effective post-injury nerve repair remains a challenge in neurosurgery, and clinical outcomes are often unsatisfactory, resulting in social and economic burden. Particularly, the repair of long-distance nerve defects remains a challenge. The existing nerve transplantation strategies show limitations, including donor site morbidity and immune rejection issues. The multiple studies have revealed the potential of tissue engineering strategies based on biomaterials in the repair of peripheral nerve injuries. We review the events of regeneration after peripheral nerve injury, evaluates the efficacy of existing nerve grafting strategies, and delves into the progress in the construction and application strategies of different nerve guidance conduits. A spotlight is cast on the materials, technologies, seed cells, and microenvironment within these conduits to facilitate optimal nerve regeneration. Further discussion was conducted on the approve of nerve guidance conduits and potential future research directions. This study anticipates and proposes potential avenues for future research, aiming to refine existing strategies and uncover innovative approaches in biomaterial-based nerve repair. This study endeavors to synthesize the collective insights from the fields of neuroscience, materials science, and regenerative medicine, offerin

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research