Advances and challenges in biomaterials for tendon and enthesis repair
Zhou H., Chen Y., Yan W., Chen X., Zi Y.
Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Bioact Mater (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40062342
- PMCID
- PMC11889517
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.01.001
- Citations
- 11
Abstract (original English)
Tendon and enthesis injuries are a global health problem affecting millions of people, causing huge medical expenditure and labor loss every year. However, due to their intricate tissue architecture, unique mechanical properties, and especially their sluggish and limited innate regenerative capacity, repairing these injuries remains a formidable clinical challenge. Here, we present a comprehensive review of biomaterials advances in tendon and enthesis repair recently. These biomaterials are categorized into two primary groups based on their potential clinical application conditions: biomaterials for T/E repairing and biomaterials for T/E replacement. The T/E repairing biomaterials were further divided into two groups: mechanical-enhanced biomaterials and bioactive biomaterials, according to the approaches they used to improve sutured tendon healing. We delve into the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of these various biomaterials to gain a deeper understanding of the current landscape in tendon and enthesis repair biomaterials. This review aims to highlight the prominent advancements while identifying the remaining gaps, ultimately inspiring future biomaterial design strategies.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
PLoS One1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Orthop Sports Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Tendon healing in the era of regenerative medicine: literature review
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, published in Ann Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Ann Transl Med - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Surgical vs. non-surgical therapy for partial tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled studies with indirect comparison
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 818 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 818
BMC Musculoskelet Disord - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Treatment options for Achilles tendinopathy: a scoping review of preclinical studies
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, published in PeerJ (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
PeerJ4 citations