Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advances and challenges in biomaterials for tendon and enthesis repair

Zhou H., Chen Y., Yan W., Chen X., Zi Y.

Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioact Mater (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40062342
PMCID
PMC11889517
DOI
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.01.001
Citations
11

Abstract (original English)

Tendon and enthesis injuries are a global health problem affecting millions of people, causing huge medical expenditure and labor loss every year. However, due to their intricate tissue architecture, unique mechanical properties, and especially their sluggish and limited innate regenerative capacity, repairing these injuries remains a formidable clinical challenge. Here, we present a comprehensive review of biomaterials advances in tendon and enthesis repair recently. These biomaterials are categorized into two primary groups based on their potential clinical application conditions: biomaterials for T/E repairing and biomaterials for T/E replacement. The T/E repairing biomaterials were further divided into two groups: mechanical-enhanced biomaterials and bioactive biomaterials, according to the approaches they used to improve sutured tendon healing. We delve into the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of these various biomaterials to gain a deeper understanding of the current landscape in tendon and enthesis repair biomaterials. This review aims to highlight the prominent advancements while identifying the remaining gaps, ultimately inspiring future biomaterial design strategies.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research