Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advances of piezoelectric biomaterials in bone defect repair: The role of direct and inverse piezoelectric effect

Dong Y., Zhang S., Xu T., Sun W., Liu X.

Narrative Review on Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Translat (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Orthop Translat (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42110953
PMCID
PMC13157110
DOI
10.1016/j.jot.2026.101106

Abstract (original English)

Natural bone exhibits piezoelectric properties due to its collagen structure. Piezoelectric biomaterials, which can replicate the electromechanical behavior of bone, have thus become a key focus in the development of artificial biomaterials. Their piezoelectricity is expressed as the direct effect under mechanical stimulation and the inverse effect under electrical stimulation. Studies have shown that appropriate mechanical or electrical cues can enhance bone defect repair by activating the piezoelectric properties of these materials, influencing osteogenesis, angiogenesis, osteoclastogenesis, inflammatory responses, and neurogenesis. This review summarizes the mechanisms through which piezoelectric biomaterials facilitate bone defect repair via direct and inverse piezoelectric effects, and discusses the current challenges and future prospects for their application in accelerating bone healing. The Translational Potential of this Article. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms by which direct and inverse piezoelectric effects in piezoelectric biomaterials facilitate bone defect repair. It highlights their roles in promoting osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis, inhibiting osteoclast differentiation, and modulating inflammatory responses. These insights are critical for the development of novel piezoelectric biomaterials and the advancement of th

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research