Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Advances in Tissue Engineering and Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction

McGue CM., Mañón VA., Viet CT.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in J Calif Dent Assoc (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Calif Dent Assoc (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34887651
PMCID
PMC8653764
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Background Reconstructive surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region poses many challenges due to the complexity of the facial skeleton and the presence of composite defects involving soft tissue, bone and nerve defects. Methods Current methods of reconstruction include autologous grafting techniques with local or regional rotational flaps or microvascular free flaps, allografts, xenografts and prosthetic devices. Results Tissue engineering therapies utilizing stem cells provide promise for enhancing the current reconstructive options. Conclusions This article is a review on tissue engineering strategies applicable to specialists who treat oral and maxillofacial defects. Practical implications We review advancements in hard tissue regeneration for dental rehabilitation, soft tissue engineering, nerve regeneration and innovative strategies for reconstruction of major defects.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research