Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Advances in the understanding of sress urinary incontinence and the promise of stem-cell therapy.

Furuta A., Carr LK., Yoshimura N., Chancellor MB.

Laboratory Study, published in Rev Urol (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Rev Urol (2007)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17934567
PMCID
PMC2002500
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

The middle urethra and external urethral sphincter are the focus in management of stress urinary incontinence, and recent cellular-therapy research suggests a new paradigm in treatment. Cell-based therapies are most often described as using autologous multipotent stem cells procured from bone marrow in procedures that may be painful, require anesthesia, and yield low numbers of mesenchymal stem cells upon processing. In contrast, muscleand adipose-derived stem cells can be obtained easily in large quantities under local anesthesia. Instead of lifting the urethra with a sling or bulking up the urethral sphincter with collagen, we now have the potential to restore function with the use of autologous stem cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.