Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Superficial Parotidectomy - Comparison of Three Reconstruction Techniques: An Interventional Clinical Study

Askar SM., Said AE., Oraby T., Khaled I., Megahed MA., Awad AM.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 29 on Face & Skin, published in Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2025)
Reported sample size
29
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41113747
PMCID
PMC12530910
DOI
10.1055/s-0045-1809930

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Preauricular defects is one of the main concerns after superficial parotidectomy. Plastic surgeons have described many filling techniques to overcome the problem. Objective To discuss and compare the esthetic and functional outcomes of three postsuperficial parotidectomy reconstruction techniques: partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap, en-bloc fat grafting, and platelet-rich fibrin gel. Methods We included 29 adult patients submitted to reconstruction after superficial parotidectomy by partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap, en-bloc fat grafting, and platelet-rich fibrin gel. A subjective evaluation of the overall facial appearance was conducted through a 5-point visual analog scale filled out by the patient, a close relative, and 3 blind staff members. Results Regarding the visual analog scale, in the comparison between the three groups (at the sixth and the twelfth months), the fat group reported the highest mean for satisfaction (3.4 ± 1.1 and 3.83 ± 0.97 respectively) and showed a highly-significant difference when compared to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap and the platelet-rich fibrin gel groups ( p = 0.0001 and 0.016 respectively). Conclusion Parotidectomy with immediate reconstruction of the surgical defect with an en-block fat graft provides better esthetic outcomes than sternocleidomastoid mus

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research