Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Alteration of Transcriptomic Profile and Antiseptic Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Under Different Culture Conditions.

Chen C., Hou X., Jing F., Wang T., Feng L., Kang YJ.

Animal Study on Chronic Inflammation, published in Stem Cells Dev (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Stem Cells Dev (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36511391
DOI
10.1089/scd.2022.0238

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are a promising therapeutic agent for various diseases, including sepsis. However, translating MSC therapy to clinical applications remains challenging due to variations in the properties of MSCs under different preparation conditions. In this study, the gene expression profiles of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (ADSCs) under different culture conditions were compared in relation to their therapeutic efficacy for sepsis. Results showed that ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with human platelet lysates (hPL) (hPL-ADSCs) exhibited a smaller cell size and higher proliferative capacity, whereas ADSCs cultured in media supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) (FBS-ADSCs) showed a broader and flatter shape. Both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs exhibited a protective effect in a mouse model of sepsis; however, hPL-ADSCs displayed a better potency for immunosuppressive function, as evidenced by a better improvement of survival rate and further reduction of tissue injury and infectious biomarkers (alanine transaminase and procalcitonin). Furthermore, hPL-ADSCs caused a more anti-inflammatory transcriptomic shift, whereas FBS-ADSCs led to more depression of proinflammatory transcriptomic response. This study thus demonstrates that both hPL-ADSCs and FBS-ADSCs are effective for antiseptic therapy via different mechanisms of inflamma

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
MiceAnimalsHumansCell Culture TechniquesTranscriptomeCell DifferentiationBlood PlateletsCulture MediaCell ProliferationMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research