Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Alternatively activated macrophages at the recipient site improve fat graft retention by promoting angiogenesis and adipogenesis

Li Y., Chen X., Liu L., Chen Y., Bi X., Chen Y.

Animal Study on Chronic Inflammation, published in J Cell Mol Med (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Cell Mol Med (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
35570832
PMCID
PMC9170812
DOI
10.1111/jcmm.17330
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

The inflammatory response mediated by macrophages plays a role in tissue repair. Macrophages preferentially infiltrate the donor site and subsequently, infiltrate the recipient site after fat grafting. This study aimed to trace host-derived macrophages and to evaluate the effects of macrophage infiltration at the recipient site during the early stage on long-term fat graft retention. In our novel mouse model, all mice underwent simulated liposuction and were divided into 2 groups. The fat procurement plus grafting (Pro-Grafting) group was engrafted with prepared fat (0.3 ml). The pro-Grafting+M2 group was engrafted with prepared fat (0.3 ml) mixed with 1.0 × 10 6 GFP+M0 macrophages, and then, 2 ng IL-4 was injected into the grafts on Day 3. In addition, 1.0 × 10 6 GFP+M0 macrophages were injected into the tail vein for tracing in the Pro-Grafting group. As a result, GFP+macrophages first infiltrated the donor site and subsequently infiltrated the recipient site in the Pro-Grafting group. The long-term retention rate was higher in the Pro-Grafting+M2 group (52% ± 6.5%) than in the Pro-Grafting group (40% ± 3.5%). CD34+ and CD31+ areas were observed earlier, and expression of the adipogenic proteins PPAR-γ, C/EBP and AP2 was higher in the Pro-Grafting+M2 group than in the Pro-Grafting group. The host macrophages preferentially infiltrate the donor site, and then, infiltrate the r

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueMacrophagesAnimalsMiceDisease Models, AnimalNeovascularization, PathologicGraft SurvivalNeovascularization, PhysiologicAdipogenesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research