Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Alternatives to animal-derived extracellular matrix hydrogels? An explorative study with HepaRG cells in animal-free hydrogels under static and dynamic culture conditions

Nitsche KS., Carmichael PL., Malcomber S., Müller I., Bouwmeester H.

Laboratory Study on Scar, published in Front Toxicol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Front Toxicol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41244631
PMCID
PMC12611971
DOI
10.3389/ftox.2025.1649393
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

New approach methodologies (NAMs) aim for animal-free chemical risk assessments. However, many in vitro NAM models still depend heavily on Matrigel and collagen despite the ethical, reproducibility, and biomedical concerns regarding the use of animal-derived materials. As awareness regarding this problem grows, several animal-free extracellular matrix hydrogel alternatives have emerged in the market. However, NAM studies with alternative hydrogels are rather scarce. The present study provides a concise review of commercially available animal-free hydrogels as well as an experimental screening approach to identify biocompatible candidates for HepaRG cell culturing under static and dynamic conditions in a 96-well plate and an OrganoPlate 3-lane device (Mimetas B.V.), respectively. The hydrogels evaluated herein include PeptiMatrix Core and PuraMatrix as synthetic peptides, VitroGel Organoid-3 as a synthetic polysaccharide, GrowDex as a wood-derived polysaccharide, and a Matrigel-collagen mix as the animal-derived reference. The health and functionality of the HepaRG cells were assessed via viability, lactate dehydrogenase leakage, albumin and bile acid secretion, CYP3A4 enzyme activity, and gene expression analyses. All animal-free hydrogels tested herein supported HepaRG cell proliferation in both culture conditions, although the cells had inadequate structure support and exhibi

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research