Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Ameloblastic Carcinoma: A 40-Year Scoping Review of the Literature

Cristofaro MG., Barca I., Sottile AR., Ferragina F.

Narrative Review with a reported sample of 80 on Face & Skin, published in Curr Issues Mol Biol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Curr Issues Mol Biol (2025)
Reported sample size
80
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40699660
PMCID
PMC12025990
DOI
10.3390/cimb47040261
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is a rare malignant odontogenic tumor with limited knowledge surrounding its pathogenesis, molecular pathways, clinical behavior, treatment, and prognosis. This 40-year literature scoping review aims to enhance the comprehension of this complex condition, looking closely at how AC works at molecular and pathophysiological levels and what causes it to develop. Methods The PUBMED, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane central databases were searched, including articles from 1984 to date. Articles reporting epidemiological, clinical, instrumental, and histopathological data were included. Results Out of the 375 articles examined, 52 met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 80 cases of AC. All cases before 1984 were excluded from the analysis, as were all that did not provide information on patient survival. Several molecular mechanisms associated with its development and progression were identified; these help in early diagnosis. Moreover, AC can spread locally, making a radical surgical approach necessary. There is still no agreement on how to manage neck dissection. Surgical removal followed by monitoring is an important part of managing AC. Conclusions Advancements in biological and molecular insights have the potential to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment. These could lead to improvements in patients' quality of life and long-term

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research