Amendments to ASRM: Can we move away from a "Therapeutic Haven"?
Ikka T., Hatta T., Fujita M.
Laboratory Study, published in Stem Cell Reports (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Stem Cell Reports (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39547227
- PMCID
- PMC11751797
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.10.006
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
The key amendment to the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in June 2024 is regarding on-site inspections and the criteria for disqualifying the Certified Special Committees for Regenerative Medicine and Certified Committees for Regenerative Medicine. Appropriate regulations are needed after the legal amendment to stop the widespread use of unproven interventions and move away from the concept of a "Therapeutic Haven."
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.