Analysis of Fat Graft Survival and Platelet-Rich Plasma Effects: The Transcriptomic Differences
Yeğin EE., Yeğin ME., Kosova B., Gür E., Nuriyev U.
Laboratory Study, published in Cureus (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Cureus (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 36874761
- PMCID
- PMC9977076
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.34380
- Citations
- 3
Abstract (original English)
Introduction Fat graft survival has been studied numerously but has not gone beyond hypothetical solutions. The molecular changes in survival of standard fat grafts and enhanced survival by platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are compared in this study to reveal the etiology that causes the loss of fat grafts after transplantation. Materials and methods A New Zealand rabbit's inguinal fat pads were excised and divided into three groups: Sham, Control (C), and PRP. Each weighing 1 g, C and PRP fat were placed into the bilateral parascapular area of the rabbit. After 30 days, the remaining fat grafts were harvested and weighed (C = 0.7 g, PRP = 0.9 g). All three specimens were put into transcriptome analysis. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Analysis were done to compare the genetic pathways between the specimens. Results Transcriptome analysis showed similar differential expressions in Sham vs. PRP and Sham vs. C comparisons, indicating the dominance of the cellular immune response in both C and PRP specimens. C and PRP comparison resulted in inhibited migration and inflammation pathways in PRP. Conclusion Fat graft survival is more related to immune responses than any other physiological process. PRP enhances survival by attenuating cellular immune reactions.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.