Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Analysis of the safety of mesenchymal stromal cells secretome for glioblastoma treatment.

Onzi GR., Ledur PF., Hainzenreder LD., Bertoni AP., Silva AO., Lenz G.

Laboratory Study, published in Cytotherapy (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cytotherapy (2016)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27210718
DOI
10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.03.299
Citations
25

Abstract (original English)

Background aims The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the secretome of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSC) affects human glioblastoma (GBM) cancer stem cell (CSC) subpopulation or has any influence on drug resistance and cell migration, evaluating the safety of hADSCs for novel cancer therapies. Methods hADSCs were maintained in contact with fresh culture medium to produce hADSCs conditioned medium (CM). GBM U87 cells were cultured with CM and sphere formation, expression of genes related to resistance and CSCs-MGMT, OCT4, SOX2, NOTCH1, MSI1-and protein expression of OCT4 and Nanog were analyzed. The influence of hADSC CM on GBM resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) was evaluated by measuring cumulative population doubling and hADSC CM influence on tumor cell migration was analyzed using transwell assay. Results hADSC CM did not alter CSC-related features such as sphere-forming capacity and expression of genes related to CSC. hADSC CM treatment alone did not change proliferation rate of U87 cells and, most important, did not alter the response of tumor cells to TMZ. However, hADSC CM secretome increased the migration capacity of glioblastoma cells. Discussion hADSC CM neither induced an enrichment of CSCs in U87 cells population nor interfered in the response to TMZ in culture. Nevertheless, paracrine factors released by hADSCs were able to modulate glioblastoma

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCulture Media, ConditionedDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.