The anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in immediate oncoplastic breast reconstruction: current applications and future perspectives
Kong W., Wang Z., Liu Y., Pei J., Guo F.
Narrative Review on Scar, published in Front Oncol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Oncol (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41727632
- PMCID
- PMC12920241
- DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2026.1765679
Abstract (original English)
In recent years, the anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap has gained increasing attention for its minimal donor-site morbidity, natural contour, and excellent scar concealment. This review begins by outlining the vascular anatomy of the anterior intercostal perforators, including their distribution, perfusion characteristics, and key considerations for preoperative imaging. We then summarize the indications and limitations of other commonly used chest wall perforator flaps, such as the lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps to contextualize the unique role of AICAP in partial breast reconstruction. Building on this foundation, we focus on the surgical design, harvest dimensions, arc of rotation, and anatomical relationship between AICAP flaps and the inframammary fold. Compared with traditional local flaps, AICAP flaps offer reliable vascularity, excellent tissue compliance, minimal donor-site disruption, and low rates of postoperative complications. Their location within a natural skin crease also allows the resulting scar to remain well concealed. These features make AICAP particularly suitable for precise reconstruction of defects in the lower and lower-inner breast quadrants, where long-term aesthetic stability is often difficult to achieve. Nonetheless, standardized indications, anatomical variability,
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations