Application of Human Epineural Conduit Supported with Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Novel Therapy for Enhancement of Nerve Gap Regeneration
Siemionow M., Strojny MM., Kozlowska K., Brodowska S., Grau-Kazmierczak W., Cwykiel J.
Animal Study with a reported sample of 6, published in Stem Cell Rev Rep (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Stem Cell Rev Rep (2022)
- Reported sample size
- 6
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 34787795
- PMCID
- PMC8930890
- DOI
- 10.1007/s12015-021-10301-z
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
Various therapeutic methods have been suggested to enhance nerve regeneration. In this study, we propose a novel approach for enhancement of nerve gap regeneration by applying human epineural conduit (hEC) supported with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC), as an alternative to autograft repair. Restoration of 20 mm sciatic nerve defect with hEC created from human sciatic nerve supported with hMSC was tested in 4 experimental groups (n = 6 each) in the athymic nude rat model (Crl:NIH-Foxn1 rnu ): 1 - No repair control, 2 - Autograft control, 3 - Matched diameter hEC filled with 1 mL saline, 4 - Matched diameter hEC supported with 3 × 10 6 hMSC. Assessments included: functional tests: toe-spread and pinprick, regeneration assessment by immunofluorescence staining: HLA-1, HLA-DR, NGF, GFAP, Laminin B, S-100, VEGF, vWF and PKH26 labeling; histomorphometric analysis of myelin thickness, axonal density, fiber diameter and myelinated nerve fibers percentage; Gastrocnemius Muscle Index (GMI) and muscle fiber area ratio. Best sensory and motor function recovery, as well as GMI and muscle fiber area ratio, were observed in the autograft group, and were comparable to the hEC with hMSC group (p = 0.038). Significant improvements of myelin thickness (p = 0.003), fiber diameter (p = 0.0296), and percentage of myelinated fibers (p < 0.0001) were detected in hEC group supported with hMSC comp
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.