The Application of Mechanical Stimulations in Tendon Tissue Engineering
Sheng R., Jiang Y., Backman LJ., Zhang W., Chen J.
Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, published in Stem Cells Int (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Stem Cells Int (2020)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33029149
- PMCID
- PMC7532391
- DOI
- 10.1155/2020/8824783
- Citations
- 38
Abstract (original English)
Tendon injury is the most common disease in the musculoskeletal system. The current treatment methods have many limitations, such as poor therapeutic effects, functional loss of donor site, and immune rejection. Tendon tissue engineering provides a new treatment strategy for tendon repair and regeneration. In this review, we made a retrospective analysis of applying mechanical stimulation in tendon tissue engineering, and its potential as a direction of development for future clinical treatment strategies. For this purpose, the following topics are discussed; (1) the context of tendon tissue engineering and mechanical stimulation; (2) the applications of various mechanical stimulations in tendon tissue engineering, as well as their inherent mechanisms; (3) the application of magnetic force and the synergy of mechanical and biochemical stimulation. With this, we aim at clarifying some of the main questions that currently exist in the field of tendon tissue engineering and consequently gain new knowledge that may help in the development of future clinical application of tissue engineering in tendon injury.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
PLoS One1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Orthop Sports Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Tendon healing in the era of regenerative medicine: literature review
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, published in Ann Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Ann Transl Med - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Surgical vs. non-surgical therapy for partial tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled studies with indirect comparison
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 818 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 818
BMC Musculoskelet Disord - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Treatment options for Achilles tendinopathy: a scoping review of preclinical studies
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, published in PeerJ (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
PeerJ4 citations