Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewPubMedOpen access

The Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Treating Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Scoping Review.

Silverstein E., Richmann M., Tyl D., Fiaoni A., Pfeifer K., Moussa H.

Systematic Review on Scar, published in Cureus (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Cureus (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39735115
PMCID
PMC11678155
DOI
10.7759/cureus.74611
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a medical condition that affects the lungs and causes scarring due to the deposition of excess fibrotic tissue. This is often preceded by various causes and can lead to long-term health consequences. The treatment of PF using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to correct lung damage and decrease inflammation is a current focus of research. MSCs are beneficial in inhibiting the immune response and inducing more efficient repair processes, therefore having the potential to be useful in various settings. This review aims to identify the current utilization of MSCs in treating PF in adults. A systematic search was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual using Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies. Following PRISMA guidelines, eligible peer-reviewed studies that used MSCs to treat adults with PF were identified. The initial search produced 1,836 articles after removing duplicates. Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. A final analysis of the articles further narrowed the number to eight articles that met all criteria and were relevant to the scoping review's objective. Four studies utilized bone marrow-derived MSCs, two utilized umbilical-derived MSCs, one utilized placenta-derived MSCs, and one utilized adipose-derived MSCs. Of these studies, five administered treatments via an intravenous infusion,

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research