Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

[Application progress of implantation in surgical treatment of cervical tuberculosis]

Wang X., Li M., Zhu Y., Zhu Q.

Narrative Review on Back & Spine, published in Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
35038810
PMCID
PMC8844622
DOI
10.7507/1002-1892.202107048
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Objective To review the characteristics and applications of different implantation in cervical tuberculosis surgery and the research progress of the new implantation. Methods By consulting relevant domestic and foreign research literature on cervical tuberculosis, the classification, advantages, disadvantages, and prospects of implantations were analyzed and summarized. Results The incidence of cervical tuberculosis has increased recently and has a high disability rate. Currently, the implantation in the surgical treatment of cervical tuberculosis are mainly divided into bone materials, metal materials, and bioactive materials; the above materials have their own advantages and disadvantages, for example, the amount of autologous bone is limited, the complications of allogeneic bone are common, and the bone fusion effect of metal materials is poor. With the development of science and technology, the implantation are also more diverse. Conclusion The choice of the implantation affects the bone fusion directly, furthermore, it affects the effectiveness of cervical tuberculosis, the development of new implantation provides a variety of options for the treatment of cervical tuberculosis.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
NeckCervical VertebraeHumansTuberculosisTreatment OutcomeSpinal FusionBone TransplantationTransplantation, Autologous

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research