Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Application of Tissue Engineering to Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Chapple CR., Osman NI., Mangera A., Hillary C., Roman S., Bullock A.

Narrative Review, published in Low Urin Tract Symptoms (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Low Urin Tract Symptoms (2015)
Country
Australia
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
26663684
DOI
10.1111/luts.12098
Citations
22

Abstract (original English)

Synthetic or biological materials can be used for the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI). While non-degradable synthetic mesh has a low failure rate, it is prone to complications such as infection and erosion, particularly in the urological/gynecological setting when subject to chronic influences of gravity and intermittent, repetitive strain. Biological materials have lower complication rates, although allografts and xenografts have a high risk of failure and the theoretical risk of infection. Autografts are used successfully for the treatment of SUI and are not associated with erosion; however, can lead to morbidity at the donor site. Tissue engineering has thus become the focus of interest in recent years as researchers seek an ideal tissue remodeling material for urogynecological repair. Herein, we review the directions of current and future research in this exciting field. Electrospun poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) and porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) are two promising scaffold material candidates. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) appear to be a suitable cell type for scaffold seeding, and cells grown on scaffolds when subjected to repetitive biaxial strain show more appropriate biomechanical properties for clinical implantation. After implantation, an appropriate level of acute inflammation is important to precipitate mo

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Guided Tissue RegenerationHumansPelvic Organ ProlapseStem Cell TransplantationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.