The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration
Chen S., Yoo JJ., Wang M.
Clinical Trial on Scar, published in Mater Today Bio (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Mater Today Bio (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40070871
- PMCID
- PMC11894340
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101594
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Uterine injuries, particularly damages to endometrium, are usually associated with abnormal menstruation, recurrent miscarriage, pregnancy complications, and infertility. Tissue engineering using cell-based, biomolecule-based, or biomaterial and scaffold-based strategies has emerged as a novel and promising approach for uterine regeneration. Stem cells, biomolecules, and porous scaffolds used alone or, very often, used in combination as a more effective treatment means have shown great potential in promoting uterine regeneration. The reported preclinical studies have indicated that appropriate tissue engineering strategies could safely and effectively reconstruct not only endometrium but also partial or even the whole uterine structure. However, the progress in the uterine regeneration area is slow in comparison to that of regenerating many other body tissues and hence it still remains a great challenge to apply uterine tissue engineering for clinical applications. In this review, conventional treatments for uterine-related diseases are briefly reviewed and discussed first. Subsequently, tissue engineering strategies (cell-based, biomolecule-based, biomaterial and scaffold-based, or their combinations) for uterine repair in preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and analyzed. Finally, the challenges and perspectives in uterine regeneration are pointed and discuss
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations