Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

[The application of urine derived stem cells in regeneration of musculoskeletal system]

Xing F., Liu G., Duan X., Xiang Z.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
30417628
PMCID
PMC8414118
DOI
10.7507/1002-1892.201804024
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Objective To review the application of urine derived stem cells (USCs) in regeneration of musculoskeletal system. Methods The original literature about USCs in the regeneration of musculoskeletal system was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results The source of USCs is noninvasive and extensive. USCs express MSCs surface markers with stable proliferative and multi-directional differentiation capabilities, and are widely used in bone, skin, nerve, and other skeletal and muscle system regeneration fields and show a certain repair capacity. Conclusion USCs from non-invasive sources have a wide application prospect in the regeneration of musculoskeletal system, but the definite biological mechanism of its repair needs further study.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Musculoskeletal SystemStem CellsUrineRegenerationCell Differentiation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research