Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Applications of Modern Cell Therapies: The Latest Data in Ophthalmology

Iliadis I., Pechnikova NA., Poimenidou M., Almaliotis DD., Tsinopoulos I., Yaremenko TV.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Life (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Life (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41157282
PMCID
PMC12565404
DOI
10.3390/life15101610
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Cell-based therapeutics are redefining interventions for vision loss by enabling tissue replacement, regeneration, and neuroprotection. This review surveys contemporary cellular strategies in ophthalmology through the lenses of therapeutic effectiveness, translational readiness, and governance. We profile principal sources-embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal progenitor and limbal stem cells-and enabling platforms including extracellular vesicles, encapsulated cell technology and biomaterial scaffolds. We synthesize clinical evidence across age-related macular degeneration, inherited retinal dystrophies, and corneal injury/limbal stem-cell deficiency, and highlight emerging applications for glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Delivery routes (subretinal, intravitreal, anterior segment) and graft formats (single cells, sheets/patches, organoids) are compared using standardized structural and functional endpoints. Persistent barriers include GMP-compliant derivation and release testing; differentiation fidelity, maturation, and potency; genomic stability and tumorigenicity risk; graft survival, synaptic integration, and immune rejection despite ocular immune privilege; the scarcity of validated biomarkers and harmonized outcome measures and ethical, regulatory, and health-economic constraints. Promising trajec

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research