Applications of Modern Cell Therapies: The Latest Data in Ophthalmology
Iliadis I., Pechnikova NA., Poimenidou M., Almaliotis DD., Tsinopoulos I., Yaremenko TV.
Narrative Review on Scar, published in Life (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Life (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41157282
- PMCID
- PMC12565404
- DOI
- 10.3390/life15101610
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Cell-based therapeutics are redefining interventions for vision loss by enabling tissue replacement, regeneration, and neuroprotection. This review surveys contemporary cellular strategies in ophthalmology through the lenses of therapeutic effectiveness, translational readiness, and governance. We profile principal sources-embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal progenitor and limbal stem cells-and enabling platforms including extracellular vesicles, encapsulated cell technology and biomaterial scaffolds. We synthesize clinical evidence across age-related macular degeneration, inherited retinal dystrophies, and corneal injury/limbal stem-cell deficiency, and highlight emerging applications for glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Delivery routes (subretinal, intravitreal, anterior segment) and graft formats (single cells, sheets/patches, organoids) are compared using standardized structural and functional endpoints. Persistent barriers include GMP-compliant derivation and release testing; differentiation fidelity, maturation, and potency; genomic stability and tumorigenicity risk; graft survival, synaptic integration, and immune rejection despite ocular immune privilege; the scarcity of validated biomarkers and harmonized outcome measures and ethical, regulatory, and health-economic constraints. Promising trajec
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations