Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Assessment of the Influence of Acetic Acid Residue on Type I Collagen during Isolation and Characterization.

Bak SY., Lee SW., Choi CH., Kim HW.

Laboratory Study, published in Materials (Basel) (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Materials (Basel) (2018)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30545004
PMCID
PMC6316942
DOI
10.3390/ma11122518
Citations
19

Abstract (original English)

Various methods for isolation of type I collagen using acids, bases, enzymes, and their combinations have been applied. However, a lack of standardization exists among type I collagens isolated by various approaches. Consequently, in this study, we assessed the influence of acetic acid residue on type I collagen isolated by pepsin-acetic acid treatment, the fabrication of collagen-based porous scaffolds, and the seeded cells on collagen scaffolds. Unlike the isolated collagen dialyzed by deionized water (DDW), collagen dialyzed by 0.5 M acetic acid (DAC) exhibited structural and thermal denaturation. Both DDW- and DAC-based porous scaffolds at all collagen concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2% w / v ) showed the high degree of porosity (>98%), and their pore morphologies were comparable at the same concentrations. However, the DDW- and DAC-based collagen scaffolds displayed significant differences in their physical properties (weight, thickness, and volume) and swelling behaviors. In particular, the weight losses induced by mechanical stimulation reflected the high degradation of DAC-collagen scaffolds. In cell culture experiments using adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), the characteristics of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) did not change in both DDW- and DAC-collagen scaffolds for 10 days, although cells proliferated less in the DAC-collagen scaffolds. Our results suggest that the elimi

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.