Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma of the extremity and trunk wall: importance of histological subtype with treatment recommendations.

Kooby DA., Antonescu CR., Brennan MF., Singer S.

Retrospective Study, published in Ann Surg Oncol (2004) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Ann Surg Oncol (2004)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
14699038
DOI
10.1007/BF02524350

Abstract (original English)

This study defines the behavior and classification of atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT) and well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLS) of the extremity and trunk. A total of 91 well-differentiated lipomatous tumors of the extremity and trunk were identified from a soft tissue tumor database between July 1982 and June 2001. A soft tissue pathologist, blinded to prior diagnosis and clinical outcome, reviewed histology. Those composed predominantly of mature adipose tissue with scattered atypical stromal cells and scant lipoblasts or fibrosis were ALTs. Tumors with lipoblasts but <25% fibrosis were termed lipoma-like WDLS, and those with >/=25% fibrosis were identified as sclerosing WDLS. Clinical factors were analyzed to assess effects on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Histological review identified 34 ALTs and 57 WDLSs. Of the WDLSs, 29 were lipoma-like and 28 were sclerosing. Five-year and 10-year LRFS were 100% +/- 0% and 78% +/- 9%, respectively. Factors evaluated were age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, histology, presentation status, margin status, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Positive resection margins and sclerosing histology were associated with reduced LRFS. Dedifferentiation was observed in three tumors (3%). Lipoma-like WDLSs and ALTs share similar histological features and favorable behavior. Margin-positive sclerosing WDLSs have a 10-year LRFS of only 17% and should

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdultAgedFemaleHumansLiposarcomaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective Studies

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.