Augmented migration of mesenchymal stem cells correlates with the subsidiary CXCR4 variant
Heirani-Tabasi A., Naderi-Meshkin H., Matin MM., Mirahmadi M., Shahriyari M., Ahmadiankia N.
Laboratory Study, published in Cell Adh Migr (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Cell Adh Migr (2018)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 29466916
- PMCID
- PMC5927652
- DOI
- 10.1080/19336918.2016.1243643
- Citations
- 10
Abstract (original English)
Use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been introduced as a promising tool, for structural and functional recovery of damaged tissues/organs. Studies have indicated that interactions between chemokine receptors and their ligands have a critical role in homing of MSCs to the site of injury. Although CXCR4 variants have been characterized, the exact role of each transcript in homing has remained unclear. In this study, cells were pretreated with various hypoxia-mimicking compounds (valproic acid, cobalt-chloride, and deferoxamine mesylate). Results indicated that both variants of CXCR4 were overexpressed after 24 hours of treatments and their expression could cooperatively induce and promote the cell migration. Moreover, deferoxamine mesylate was more effective in overexpression of variant A (lo), which resulted in higher level of CXCR4 protein and the highest rate of migration of the cells. In conclusion, our findings may have important potential implications in clinical applications, reinforcing the concept that manipulating the expression of specific CXCR4 variants may increase migration of MSCs.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.