Autologous Fat Grafting in Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has gained popularity in both cosmetic and reconstructive surgery, including hand surgery, due to its regenerative potential and dual benefits of enhancing aesthetics and function. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of AFG in treating various hand pathologies. Methods A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for studies published between January 2001 and October 2022 using the terms "(autologous fat grafting) AND (hand)." Of 224 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. These studies were analyzed based on study design, pathology treated, type of AFG used, and primary outcomes. Results The review included 14 studies: 9 prospective/retrospective studies, 3 case reports, and 2 randomized control trials. Digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis and hand osteoarthritis were the most frequently treated pathologies. AFG was predominantly used to address symptoms/pain (71.4%), with aesthetics as a secondary benefit in 21.4% of cases. The studies reported improvements in pain, functionality, and patient satisfaction. However, the variability in techniques and outcomes limited the ability to perform a meta-analysis. Conclusions AFG shows promise as a minimally invasive treatment option for various hand pathologies, offering both sympt

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.