Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Autologous Fat Grafting and Neurolysis for Treatment of Recalcitrant Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Gostelie OFE., Domela Nieuwenhuis I., Nanninga GL., Paulusma SB., van Dongen JA., van der Heijden BEPA.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 29, published in J Hand Surg Am (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
J Hand Surg Am (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
29
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41258834
DOI
10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.018

Abstract (original English)

Purpose There is no consensus on the treatment for recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a problem caused mainly by fibrous perineural adhesions. Neurolysis is advised with or without the interposition of vascularized tissue, a labor-intensive process causing considerable donor site morbidity. Autologous fat grafting has less donor site morbidity, and adipose-derived stromal cells in adipose tissue might recover nerve damage and prevent adhesions. The authors hypothesized that neurolysis combined with autologous fat grafting improves symptoms and reduces CTS recurrence. Methods Carpal tunnel syndrome patients with a second to fifth recurrence underwent neurolysis combined with perineural fat grafting using autologous lipoaspirate (n = 29). The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire was administered before surgery and twice during follow-up. The minimal clinically important difference was calculated individually for the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS). To determine whether patients experienced recurrence or required additional surgery, follow-up data were collected up to 5 years after surgery (range: 3-9.5 years). Results The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores improved after surgery for 86% of the patients and remained stable during the follow-up. Accordingly, median (interquartile range) SSS and FSS scores decreased from 3.75 (2.75-4.38) t

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansCarpal Tunnel SyndromeMaleFemaleMiddle AgedAdipose TissueTransplantation, AutologousRecurrenceAgedTreatment Outcome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.